Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: N to 96/2

Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Jan 21 12:41:45 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 11:08:50 2017.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
Even "railfan tradition" aside, I don't think it's such a good idea to get into the habit of just focusing exclusively on a run's destination when deciding how it should be designated.

The current N/Q plan has the train correctly signed in both directions along Broadway, Q northbound, N southbound.

But having an "F" pull in on the E track at West 4th can lead to many going the wrong way. Also, since the "F" would be skipping extra stops east of Forest Hills, an opportunity is missed to warn people that their stop will be skipped by just calling it "F."

That being said, perhaps E to 179th should appear on the subway map (dotted line) since A to Rockaway Park is practically the same service format and it's on there as such.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]