|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425870) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Michael549 on Sun Jan 29 12:03:32 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 28 21:22:34 2017. "These trains running solely out of operational necessity."Again, so what! There is simply no reason to label the E-trains that come out of or head to 179th Street as "F" trains! There is simply no reason to label the few W-trains that come out of or head to Coney Island as "N" trains as they travel to/from the train yard. There is simply no reason to label #5 trains that come out of or head to 238th Street as "#2" trains as suggested in prior messages in this stream. There is simply no reason to label N trains that head to 96th Street-Second Avenue as Q trains on the Manhattan bound trip, and then re-label those same trains as N-trains for the downtown Brooklyn bound journey. A number of silly reasons have been offered before, and those reasons still remain silly. Mike |
|
|
|