|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425451) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by GojiMet86 on Thu Jan 26 12:56:12 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by AlM on Thu Jan 26 11:50:57 2017. He had no problem understanding the proposed long-term 2017 weekend (2)/(5) changes:"1) From a staff management point of view - the #2 and 5 train operators and conductors basically get assigned to their regular work places and terminals - and simply just take a different route to get to and from those terminals. Under the hood of train route names the #2 train crews travel down Lexington Avenue while the #5 crew folk travel down the west-side." Notice the Dyre Avenue-South Ferry trains are really (5) trains running via 7th Avenue, but signed up as (2). According to his 96th-Street-bound-(N)-really-should-be-(N)-not-(Q) logic, these (5) trains to South Ferry via 7th Avenue should really be called (5) trains, not (2) trains. And the (2) trains running via Lexington should be signed up as (2), not (5). |
|
|
|