Re: N to 96/2 (1425892) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 29 15:00:12 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Sun Jan 29 07:49:54 2017. That is a complete false conclusion based on no evidence. I don't support labelling all trains to 96th as Qs because that's what the MTA wants, it's because it's the optimal solution. |