Re: N to 96/2 (1425952) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sun Jan 29 21:24:20 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by randyo on Sun Jan 29 21:13:12 2017. It's even easier to avoid accidentally getting on an N to 96st if it doesn't exist. Which as of the electronic schedule change, is now the case. |