|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425813) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sat Jan 28 22:53:53 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Fri Jan 27 17:36:52 2017. Actually, there were several options to avoid breaking he combination letter system as originated by the iND. Since there was an HH route intended to be used for a Fulton St lcl in Bkln, the letter H could have been used for the current C service since its extension into Manhattan up 8 Av does not violate any rules of IND logic since it is still a Fulton St Lcl and there was never any rule prohibiting the original HH from going into Manhattan instead of Court St. The now named B would be changed to a D since it is a Bronx Concourse/6 Ave express service and the letter D would be appropriate. The current D could then be renamed the T which was the former letter used of the pre Chrystie West End service which the D has absorbed. That would leave the now unused K and V and possibly a U or even an O for use on the SAS when the full line is eventually opened. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|