|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1426003) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Mon Jan 30 12:14:48 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by italianstallion on Mon Jan 30 12:07:52 2017. Further, NYCT planners wisely realized that the logic of the numbering scheme limited route flexibility, and when customer needs conflicted with the numbering scheme, it was better to "ruin" the numbering scheme than to not meet customer needs. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|