Re: N to 96/2 (1425447) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 26 11:50:57 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Thu Jan 26 11:33:35 2017. And even if one thinks it would be better to sign them as Ns, it's not a "lie" to sign them as Qs. It's simply a naming convention one may find unreasonable. |