|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1426020) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 30 14:19:55 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Michael549 on Mon Jan 30 13:41:12 2017. I never suggested that such a split was novel. Regardless, I am saying that a historical example of such is not good evidence of reviving said practice in the present day. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|