|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1426014) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Michael549 on Mon Jan 30 13:41:12 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 30 11:50:12 2017. I may have missed the part where you or anyone else explained that the B-train having two rush hour terminals was in your words, "problematic?"The MTA split the B-train between two terminals during the rush hours for a ten year period - and would have continued the practice except for the 20-year Manhattan Bridge repair project, and the opening of the 63rd Street "Tunnel to Nowhere" in 1989. You were the one to suggest that somehow a split of a route to two terminals in Midtown were some kind of "novel" event - requiring the debated practice on the N-train with Q-labeled trains. When the historical pattern of a previous split is mentioned - you then want to say, "It was already pointed out to you..." You are really going to have to have a better argument. Mike |
|
|
|