|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425624) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Fri Jan 27 16:55:53 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Fri Jan 27 13:37:43 2017. Although I disagree with the “Q via Sea Beach” concept, I’ll add a little fuel to the fire. Pre Chrystie, there was a Brighton Lcl (QT) that went to Ctl in the AM rush and it was signed “RR/Bway-4th Ave Lcl.” that was a case of the 4 Av Lcl via the Brighton. |
|
|
|