|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425714) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Sat Jan 28 12:11:37 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Nilet on Fri Jan 27 16:31:26 2017. I proposed something like this earlier in the thread.A changeover on the Manhattan Bridge, if executed and announced properly has the potential to inconvenience nobody, eliminating any ambiguity at Coney Island and along the entire Brooklyn portion of the run, without moving that ambiguity to Manhattan since they would see only "Q." The only ones affected by this would be Brooklyn riders headed beyond Times Square who miss everything: the destination / interior signage, the Manhattan Bridge announcements, and the station-by-station announcements in Manhattan announcing the train as a Q to 96th. But thinking about it realistically, it probably is more likely that more passenger minutes are lost due to this confusion than any confusion that may occur seeing a Q via the Sea Beach. So I admit I have no good argument against the current arrangement, for now. |
|
|
|