Re: N to 96/2 (1425964) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Sun Jan 29 22:37:22 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by randyo on Sun Jan 29 21:27:29 2017. Once again a fallacious appeal to authority.The number of stops past the split is irrelevant. It is the fact that the split between the N and Q is in the CBD and not some distance past it. |