Re: N to 96/2 (1424814) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 21 15:12:22 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Sat Jan 21 14:24:17 2017. The "solution" is misleading and stupid.Would you care to (mis)label the few Brooklyn-bound "N's as well ? |