|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425283) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 25 10:11:14 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Michael549 on Wed Jan 25 09:01:01 2017. The problem is not that people are too stupid to pay attention to N trains going to 96th Street, but that you are so obsessed with Q trains not running via Sea Beach that you just can't understand why this is a better solution. All of the arguments against the current system essentially boil down to: it's wrong to sign these trains as Qs, let a small number of careless people be very inconvenienced just to avoid the slight weirdness of a Q via Sea Beach!Do you believe that digital signs should include a train's origin station for your railfan edification? For the past 100 years there were no "computer announcement programs" - why should that fact be a decisive one here? Who cares how they used to do it? If the old way were better, they would have stuck to the old way. |
|
|
|