|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1425266) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by Michael549 on Wed Jan 25 09:01:01 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by randyo on Wed Jan 25 01:46:48 2017. That is why the silliness with those "Q-trains that are really N-trains" is just pure plain silly.The way that some folks here treat it - it is as if East-side Manhattan folks mind's will explode if an N-train just happens to go 96th Street-Second Avenue. Subway riders are intelligent human beings for the huge majority of their daily lives - but when it comes to the new subway on Second Avenue these folks are simply "too stupid" to READ or LISTEN to announcements - too many folks here and at MTA suggest! Then there's the "there's no computer announcement program, etc." rationale - as if computers are the masters of intelligent human beings! For the past 100 years there were no "computer announcement programs" - why should that fact be a decisive one here? The whole disguising N-trains as Q-trains project - and trying to pass that off as rational is just pure plain silly. Mike |
|
|
|