Re: N to 96/2 (1425648) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by italianstallion on Fri Jan 27 19:06:31 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Nilet on Fri Jan 27 16:31:26 2017. Well, of course, the N to 57th signs would be incorrect since the train would continue to 96th. |
(There are no responses to this message.)