Re: N to 96/2 (1425475) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Jan 26 15:25:22 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by R30A on Thu Jan 26 14:53:20 2017. I didn't say that signing them as Q trains wasn't better. I just said that there are drawbacks to signing them as Q trains too. |