Re: N to 96/2 (1424837)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: N to 96/2

Posted by Spider-Pig on Sat Jan 21 16:58:38 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 21 15:51:02 2017. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr Why do you need policy to be consistent? And yes, branching trains are confusing and stupid. Anything that would make the subway more incomprehensible and thus less usable is bad.

Responses

• Re: N to 96/2 - Joe V - Sat Jan 21 17:10:41 2017
  • Re: N to 96/2 - Spider-Pig - Sat Jan 21 17:25:10 2017
    • Re: N to 96/2 - Joe V - Sat Jan 21 17:32:44 2017
      • Re: N to 96/2 - R30A - Sat Jan 21 18:04:04 2017
        • Re: N to 96/2 - Spider-Pig - Sat Jan 21 18:41:19 2017
          • Re: N to 96/2 - Joe V - Sat Jan 21 19:34:08 2017
            • Re: N to 96/2 - R30A - Sat Jan 21 20:07:28 2017
              • Re: N to 96/2 - Joe V - Sun Jan 22 07:58:40 2017
                • Re: N to 96/2 - Spider-Pig - Sun Jan 22 12:29:51 2017
                  • Re: N to 96/2 - Joe V - Sun Jan 22 12:48:58 2017
                    • Re: N to 96/2 - Spider-Pig - Sun Jan 22 13:41:59 2017
      • Re: N to 96/2 - Wallyhorse - Sun Jan 22 06:50:57 2017

Post a New Response