Re: N to 96/2 (1424982) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by R30A on Sun Jan 22 18:37:07 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by randyo on Sun Jan 22 18:19:55 2017. Yes, It was an example of exactly what is not acceptable to do with regards to route designations. Such would never fly today, and for good reason. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |