Home · Maps · About
Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Dictatorship not Democracy

Posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 17:22:24 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by R30A on Sun Jun 26 22:56:11 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
So let us summarize:

YOU PREVIOUSLY STATED:

You do make assumptions but "I don't need proof."

"I don't state my allegations as fact."

OH REALLY?

"When I make an allegation there is nothing to prove."

"Yes, I am incredibly jealous. I wish I could have a nice retirement plan after being fully paid for decades to contribute nothing to the organization you work for."

"LOL. I made no assumptions." (So then you are stating the above as a fact or something with high probability.)

You stated that I was paid a lot more than $2,350,000 during my career (including pension) when you take inflation into account.

But the $42 million I saved or helped save over my career does not need to take inflation into account. (JUST ONE OF YOUR MANY INCONSISTENCIES AND CONTRADICTIONS.)

Regarding the $4 million overpayment error by the MTA, I found one day in in 1993, you responded. "You obviously did your job well for a day."

You also stated: "I never changed any position." THAT IS A CHANGE RIGHT THERE!!! You said that I contributed nothing throughout my career. Then you said I did my job well for one day.

"I diminish your accomplishments because they are absurd, and I never lie."

SO THEN YOU ARE CALLING ME A LIAR after you stated that you weren't. Another contradiction by you.

So if that was my job to save $4 million every day, if I would have done my job everyday, it logically follows the MTA would have $25 billion more in their budget, so I asked if you would blame me for the fact that the full Second Avenue subway is not complete.

You responded: "I never made that claim...but considering the delays it has seen, I wouldn't be surprised."

So according to you there is a high probability that the Second Avenue Subway was not complete because of me.

"High turnover was a fact stated by yourself." I never stated such. YOU JUST MISINTERPRETED WHAT I WROTE.

The hundred other people were working concurrently for about a month each over a three month period assembling charges. Some jobs were done concurrently and some had to be done sequentially. (YOU INACCURATELY ASSUMED EVERYTHING WAS DONE SEQUENTIALLY AND THAT MOST OF THE WORK WAS DONE BY OTHERS.)

When they were finished, I assembled the information over the next three years, sometimes having to go back for additional information.

You also stated that the high turnover you inaccurately assumed was due to me being difficult to work with when no one left their job because they couldn't work with me. You stated that was highly likely with ZERO proof. But you also stated "I don't need proof."

So to conclude, not knowing any facts, you went ahead and made at least a half dozen inaccurate assumptions which you stated as fact or with a "high" probability.

You can do that because as you stated:

"When I make an allegation there is nothing to prove."

You can even accuse me of being responsible for the Second Avenue Subway not being completed, but you don't need to show any proof.

I think we can let the readers at Buschat decide who has more credibility, you or me.

I am done with this conversation.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]