|
|
| Re: Waiting for proof (315770) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jul 8 13:49:39 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by R30A on Thu Jul 7 15:40:52 2016. Left turns ARE NEEDED. There is no room to build jug handles in urban areas.Eliminating them is insane and DOT even realizes that now by restoring 20 of their 26 proposed bans. They changed their minds because they saw the error of their ways. YOU HAVE ZERO PROOF TO ASSERT THEY STILL THINK THEY ARE A GOOD IDEA. Pure speculation on your part. Proper planning does not mean you do something stupid as long as you can get away with it. If you believe government has the right to do anything it wants without the need for proper justification, as you stated by saying DOT has no obligation to prove more are helped than are harmed, you shouldn't be living in America. BECAUSE HERE THEY HAVE THAT OBLIGATION. Wow, now you want to see my diploma and transcript! Who the hell do you think you are that I wou,d have to prove that to you? You would only respond that it was Photoshoppec anyway if I presented you with proof. You really think I am dumb. Meanwhile, you didn't answer the question of which Planning school you attended? So now you spout nonsense like proper enforcement is my fault and not the responsibility of the project. Bus travel time and SBS ridership are the only metrics being used. The MTA even disregarded local ridership declines in their B44 analysis. They are ignoring passenger trip times, THE MOST IMPORTANT METRIC. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|