|
|
| Re: Dictatorship not Democracy (315032) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dictatorship not Democracy |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Jun 29 09:54:12 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 28 17:22:24 2016. "You do make assumptions but "I don't need proof.""Yes. Assumptions stated as assumptions do not need proof. Assumptions stated as fact do. It is easy to understand for honest people. "You stated that I was paid a lot more than $2,350,000 during my career (including pension) when you take inflation into account." Yes. "But the $42 million I saved or helped save over my career does not need to take inflation into account." Nothing needs to be taken into account as YOU DID NOT SAVE 42 MILLION, WITH OR WITHOUT INFLATION. It is a laughable claim that even based on what you have said about it is blatantly false. "(JUST ONE OF YOUR MANY INCONSISTENCIES AND CONTRADICTIONS.)" There is no contradiction. "You also stated: "I never changed any position." THAT IS A CHANGE RIGHT THERE!!! You said that I contributed nothing throughout my career. Then you said I did my job well for one day." Are you really claiming that doing your job for a day of a ~30 year career means you had a productive career? "SO THEN YOU ARE CALLING ME A LIAR after you stated that you weren't. Another contradiction by you." Stating that I am not a liar does not mean that someone else IS a liar. Basic reading comprehension is missing here. "So according to you there is a high probability that the Second Avenue Subway was not complete because of me." No. I very much did not say that. The MTA is FAR too smart to put someone like yourself in charge of an important project like SAS. ""High turnover was a fact stated by yourself." I never stated such. YOU JUST MISINTERPRETED WHAT I WROTE." I did not misinterpret anything. "The hundred other people were working concurrently for about a month each over a three month period assembling charges. Some jobs were done concurrently and some had to be done sequentially. (YOU INACCURATELY ASSUMED EVERYTHING WAS DONE SEQUENTIALLY AND THAT MOST OF THE WORK WAS DONE BY OTHERS.)" Yes. 100 months of work by others would certainly be more productive than 36 months of one person. This isn't a hard concept to grasp. I made no assumption that everything was done sequentially. "You also stated that the high turnover you inaccurately assumed was due to me being difficult to work with when no one left their job because they couldn't work with me. You stated that was highly likely with ZERO proof. But you also stated "I don't need proof."" Yes. Your behavior here has made it clear that you are incredibly hard to work with. Anybody who had a profound lack of understanding of both the topic at hand(transportation), as well as the math needed to analyze such would be incredibly frustrating to work with. Especially a blowhard conspiracy theorist like yourself who appears to constantly think the world is out to get him. You can do that because as you stated: "When I make an allegation there is nothing to prove." What I said was: "When I make no allegation, there is nothing to prove" Perhaps I should suggest an ESL course for you? "You can even accuse me of being responsible for the Second Avenue Subway not being completed, but you don't need to show any proof." I did no such thing. "I think we can let the readers at Buschat decide who has more credibility, you or me." It is pretty clear many have. Here, and many other places. "I am done with this conversation." You keep on saying that. Your continued replies make me think you realize what "done" means. |
|
|
|