|
|
| Re: Dictatorship not Democracy (315076) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dictatorship not Democracy |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Jun 29 21:29:45 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 20:59:28 2016. "You claim I did not help save $42 million. SO YOU ARE CALLING ME A LIAR. Although you stated you weren't."I am not calling you a liar. I do believe that you believe you saved that much. Regardless of what you believe, you have made it clear that you did not save $42 million. "I suppose you want proof." Yeah, but I know such does not exist, so I can't say I expect to see it. "That's rich coming from the person who believes he never has to provide any proof." Actually, I do cite my facts, and state my suppositions as suppositions. That is what makes me honest. You should try it sometime. "And you are the one with the reading comprehension program. I never claimed to be in charge of the Second Avenue Subway or even have anything to do with that project." I do not believe there is a single person on this planet who has ever claimed that you were ever in charge of or even had anything to do with SAS. If that is false, my apologies- I can't say for certain that you were not involved, and I accept the possibility that you may have been. "Yet you stated that I claimed I was in charge." I have never in my life claimed that you have had anything to do with SAS, let alone being in charge of it. I know that your name isn't Bill Goodrich(Although come to think of it, I think they shifted him to another CC project and someone else is in charge of SAS now...). "What I stated was if my job was to save $4 million a day as you clearly stated it was, that means since I wasn't doing my job or contributing in positive way to the MTA as you also stated as fact, then the MTA would have had $45 billion more in their budget and much more of the Second Avenue subway could have been completed if I had been doing my job of saving $4 million a day." That is a logical fallacy with no bearing in reality. What is a part of ones job is by no means the totality of their job. "You responded that you wouldn't be surprised if that were the case." You have no understanding of the concept of snark. "Now if Terrapin, fdtutf and RIPTA 42 believe you have more credibility than me than they must also believe that if I had been properly doing my job, much more of the Second Avemue Subway would be complete." No. that does not follow that they must believe that. I have had a substantial conversations with each of them, both on line and in person on many topics over the course of the last decade and a half, so while I cannot say for sure, I think I know them well enough to state rather unequivocally: I don't believe any of them think the MTA would have been so incompetent as to have trusted you with the leadership of such an important project. "Now I am done unless you once again change what you stated. " Still nothing has changed, and yet again, I doubt you will be able to contain yourself. |
|
|
|