|
|
| Re: Dictatorship not Democracy (315080) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dictatorship not Democracy |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Jun 29 23:17:48 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jun 29 22:22:19 2016. "All you did was make accusations about me without citing any proof whatsoever."The only accusation I have is that you are hopelessly incompetent. Your posts here are ample proof of that. "You clearly stated a number of times as I quoted, that you are not required to present any proof." If I am not making a claim, there is nothing to prove, so not only am I not required to present any proof, but it is impossible to do so. "And you would dispute any proof I would provide, so why even bother trying." Of course! Things that you say are rarely true, and rarely relevant to the point being made, so why would I accept it as proof. "If you are so interested, you can ask the MTA Chairman. He knows." Really? That one I certainly would need proof in writing to believe. And not some form letter you have framed on your wall somewhere. "I clearly stated that I had nothing whatsoever to do with the Second Avenue Subway." I fully believe you. "Yet you state that you accept the possibility that I did work on the project." I see no purpose to reject the possibility of something I admittedly know nothing about. "THAT IS SAYING I AM A LIAR." How could that possibly be calling you a liar? A. I don't claim that anything you said with regards to SAS is false. B. I do not believe you have a full understanding of your involvement with projects, so even if you make a false statement, that would not make you a liar. "What is part of one's job is by no means the totality of their job." "So now you say that saving $4 million a day (which you stated was my job responsibility) was not enough." I have never stated that saving $4 million a day was your job responsibility. "My responsibilities should have included more." No. I don't think they should have trusted you with any responsibilities at all. "Show me one person at the MTA who even saves $1 million a day." I doubt there is such a person. Nobody has made the claim that there is. "YOUR STATEMENTS ARE JUST UTTERLY RIDICULOUS." Another ironic statement worthy of the history books. "Why do you keep harping on that the MTA never would have trusted me to run the Second Avenue Subway?" Because you somehow seem to think that I would believe you are in charge of SAS. Let me be blunt. I do not, nor have ever believe, nor have ever stated in any way that you were in charge of the SAS project. "That is a totally irrelevent point." Yes, but you keep on bringing it up! "I never said they would have or I would have accepted if it were offered which would not have occurred anyway." Nice shermanism. "Terrapin, fdtutf and RIPTA 42 believing that I am not competent to hold that position does not mean they believe you are more credible than I am since I never stated I was competent to hold that position." Correct. It is the fact that they said they think I am more credible that makes me think that they think I am more credible. "But if they believe you more than they believe me, they must agree with you that my job was to at least save $4 million a day in addition to other responsibilities which you clearly stated. Are you now going to deny you said that?" I have no reason to believe that any of the four people listed (including myself) have ever believed or stated that your job was ever to save the MTA $4 million dollars a day. |
|
|
|