|
|
| Re: Waiting for proof (315631) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Thu Jul 7 14:46:28 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Jul 7 14:26:01 2016. "Yes, but the prudent thing to do now rather than proceeding blindly is to determine why car travel has been slowed by 38 percent on that small segment in one direction during the peak hour BEFORE IMP,EMENTING THE REST OF THE PLAN which could further slow down travel."And you assume they aren't doing that. "Interesting how you now refer to it as only "ONE PEAK HOUR" when before you were claiming that data for only ONE PEAK HOUR was all that was required since volumes are lighter at all other times." Typical inconsistencies by you." There are no inconsistencies. One peak hour certainly could be enough information. You were claiming that it could not be, now you are using it as fact that it is. |
|
|
|