Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Dictatorship not Democracy

Posted by R30A on Sun Jun 26 22:56:11 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Jun 24 20:13:33 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"This back and forth is getting ridiculous where you dissect every word."
I don't dissect every word. Sometimes I go down to the sentence level, and occasionally down to the phrase, but not every word.

"Okay you didn't say you don't make assumptions."
Correct!

"You said you never make assumptions and state them as fact."
Correct!

"Maybe so, but you state them as probabilities when in fact there is no probability."
A. In many cases where you seem to assume I have assigned a probability to something, when I have not.
B. Probabilities range from 0 to 1, so this statement is meaningless.
C. In many of these cases, they are rather high, you just do not understand the situation.

"Like D when you stated someone else would have caught the $4 million error. I proved to you how that didn't happen so stating it as a probability is just as bad as stating it as a fact."
A. You proved nothing.
B. If the probability of an event in reality is .6 and you assume it is .8, that is without a doubt better than assuming 1, so your argument is false.

"Also, your assumptions are frequently incorrect."
Actually, they tend not to be. That is why I make them!

"I stated that 100 others assisted me in recouping the $30 million."
Yes, you did!

"YOU ASSUMED. They did most of the work which was untrue."
You claim such. For 31 people to work on a project and have one person do a majority of the work is not a believable outcome. Especially not from the one person who claims to do the work, when they are somebody who has a track record of inflating their worth.

"so I explained that I worked on the project for three years and none of the others spent more than one month. YOU THEN MADE THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT THEY DID NOT WORK CONCURRENTLY BY STATING THERE WAS A HIGH TURNOVER."
I made no such assumption. High turnover was a stated fact by yourself. Literally in the sentence before this one. None of the others spent more than a month. If I was wrong in assuming that your statement was true, I apologize. I know better, but was assuming such for the sake of argument.

"Then you went on further that this turnover was do to my being incredibly difficult to work with."
I do not claim such is certain. It just appears highly likely.

"So not only have you never heard of teamwork, you never heard of 100 people working in a single project at more or less the same time."
I have actually heard of both!

"I had to coordinate with dozens of departments within the NYCT as well as the other MTA agencies who had employees charging time to the 911 recovery effort."
wow!

"NO ONE LEFT THEIR JOB BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T WORK WITH ME."
I think most incompetent people would like to think that.

"You just make inaccurate assumptions and state untrue probabilities with zero proof to disprove my many accomplishments while making innuendos like my accomplishments are absurd."
You disprove your supposed accomplishments whenever you post, when you demonstrate a severe lack of understanding of traffic engineering, transportation systems, and even simple arithmetic functions. Also, when have I stated a probability"

"SO I WAS CORRECT BY PREDICTING YOUR RESPONSE WOULD BE THAT I AM LYING."
Nah. I will not reject the possibility, but I think you may in fact be delusional enough to think all of this, in which case it would not be a lie. Such would not however make any of it true.

"Everything I stated is true and I do not have to defend myself to you."
Myself and others have repeatedly shown that not everything you state is true. It is plainly obvious that a clear majority of your writings have at least some significant factual errors.

"THE RECORD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF."
Yup.

"YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH AND AS YOU ADMITTED YOU ARE INCREDIBLY JEALOUS."
lol.

"I don't believe you were being sarcastic for a single minute."
If I had any internal doubt that I was being sarcastic, thank you for reducing it!

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]