Home · Maps · About
Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Proof Terrapin is full of BS When he calls me factually and logically incorrect

Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Oct 10 21:20:37 2016, in response to Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvd, posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Thu Aug 11 21:31:52 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Terrapin takes every opportunity to try to discredit me by calling me names like 'liar" and "idiot."

Now we have proof that he is full of BS.

Part of the reason this thread has become so long and unmanageable is because of his constant accusations forcing me to constantly defend myself.

So here is the proof:

Earlier in this thread there were the following posts:

Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Sep 18 01:39:29 2016, in response to Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvdn medians done, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Sep 16 17:46:52 2016.

Nope, you're wrong. Even a non-reoccurring plan can be in effect and still be a plan in the existing conditions.

Nope, you're wrong. Just because you get a letter published does not mean you're not an idiot. Plenty of idiots get their letters published. It has nothing to do with whether I agree with them or not. It has to do with being factually or logically incorrect. That makes them idiots. And for that very reason, you are an idiot!


This was my response.

Posted by BrooklynBus on Sun Sep 18 14:24:45 2016, in response to BrooklynBus is factually or logically incorrect -- the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvdn median, posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Sep 18 01:39:29 2016.

FYI the letter I wrote that was published by the New York Times was in 1975. It recommended that the MTA should renumber crosstown bus routes to reflect the street they run on. For example, the M106 should become the M42 when the MTA renumbered duplicate route numbers sequentially. For example there were three routes called 15 at the time. I was told at that time only one out of 20 letters were selected for publication.

I made the same suggestion in 1984 at a job interview with the head of Operations Planning. In effect, he told me that it was a dumb idea. Then three weeks later, he renumbered the routes exactly as I suggested.

So according to you they did not publish 19 letters so they could pick one written by an idiot. A letter that was factually or logically incorrect according to you, which the MTA saw value in.

And since your first paragraph is non-sensical and logically incorrect, the only idiot around here is you.

There was no response to the above post from the poster who usually wants the last word.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]