Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 5 19:15:00 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 19:09:31 2009.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
If we accept the Bush/Gore ruling, then this is one of those STFU moments for Coleman. But then again, heh. So here you have an independent who has no use for either of the other major parties and somehow I end up pigeonholed.

We could of course go back to 2000 and Florida and 2004 in Ohio and play that all out again, but in both precedents, the one "officially certified" by the state ended up in office. Therefore ... moo. :)

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]