Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400613)		Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota

Posted by Charles G on Wed Jan 7 09:46:07 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by AMoreira81 on Tue Jan 6 22:01:31 2009. edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Then why didn't Indiana's Republican governor do anything about it? The blame starts with Mitch Daniels---NOT officials in Gary. ??? If the officials in Gary committed fraud, then the blame starts with them. What kind of twisted logic are they teaching you?

Responses

• Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 10:50:17 2009
  • Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota - Charles G - Wed Jan 7 13:26:03 2009
    • Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 15:48:18 2009
      • Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota - AlM - Wed Jan 7 16:02:04 2009
        • Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 16:54:15 2009
        • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 17:09:40 2009
          • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 17:26:41 2009
            • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - AlM - Wed Jan 7 17:32:47 2009
              • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:09:51 2009
                • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:11:11 2009
              • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:15:00 2009
                • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:18:40 2009
                • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:20:56 2009
                  • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - trainsarefun - Wed Jan 7 18:50:22 2009
                  • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AlM - Wed Jan 7 19:12:08 2009
                    • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 19:41:15 2009
                      • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AlM - Wed Jan 7 19:59:36 2009
                        • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 20:22:57 2009
              • Re: unlikely Coleman/Franken MN will go to SCOTUS either - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:21:52 2009
                • Re: unlikely Coleman/Franken MN will go to SCOTUS either - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:24:33 2009

Post a New Response