Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair (400686)		Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair

Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Jan 7 17:26:41 2009, in response to Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair, posted by JLenard on Wed Jan 7 17:09:40 2009. edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d However...if Reid decides to take his chances with the federal courts to back him up, I see Anthony Kennedy going along for this case, which means a 5-4 ruling declaring Obama's former seat vacant until 2010.

Responses

• Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - AlM - Wed Jan 7 17:32:47 2009
  • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:09:51 2009
    • Re: The BlahGo (my nickname for him) and Burris affair - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:11:11 2009
  • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:15:00 2009
    • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:18:40 2009
    • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:20:56 2009
      • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - trainsarefun - Wed Jan 7 18:50:22 2009
      • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AlM - Wed Jan 7 19:12:08 2009
        • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 19:41:15 2009
          • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - AlM - Wed Jan 7 19:59:36 2009
            • Re: I disagree, not a SCOTUS issue... they won't intervene - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 20:22:57 2009
  • Re: unlikely Coleman/Franken MN will go to SCOTUS either - JLenard - Wed Jan 7 18:21:52 2009
    • Re: unlikely Coleman/Franken MN will go to SCOTUS either - AMoreira81 - Wed Jan 7 18:24:33 2009

Post a New Response