|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400679) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by JLenard on Wed Jan 7 15:55:52 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by R30A on Wed Jan 7 15:18:09 2009. were they "really" improperly rejected or just deemed that after the fact that those Districts discovered they were needed to push Franken over the top and therefore "re-defined as improperly rejected" in order to provide the required "Late-Voting" (coined that term here: "Early Voting" and "Reform" NOT "Change" before the Election, didn't realize it would be happening so soon) We will not know the full answer to that until Coleman's official "Contest" of the Election and proper standing in Filing Suit will allow/force the cases be heard (not just dismissed away w/o full hearing)....related: Dem's ignore Law, we pay -/- MSM Election Spin/Narrative, to influence Votes rather than just report on election -/- Can we afford Obama $URRENDER doctrine? -/- Vote Psychology (Bandwagon, Bradley, etc) effect -/- the Blagojevich fiasco (Pay-to-play, Burris, Law/Constitution, Fundraising, more...) |
|
|
|