|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400642) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Jan 7 13:32:36 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Fred G on Tue Jan 6 21:55:02 2009. I wondered in 2000 what would happen if the shoe were on the other foot. Would the GOP stand down like they recommended Al Gore do so often back then or would they also fight to the finish for recount after recount?Now I know. I don't know about anyone else, but I thought in 2000 that Gore's court challenge should not have been halted by the Supreme Court. Similarly, I feel now that Coleman has the right to continue to use the courts for redress as long as they will allow him to. But of course Franken can use Bush v Gore as an argument for the courts cutting off Coleman's right to redress. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|