|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400120) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Mon Jan 5 20:34:24 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 20:12:25 2009. How statistically unlikely is it that the added votes would have a breakdown so skewed from the overall total without political meddling?AIUI, they were largely absentee ballots. Absentees vote strangely. |
|
|
|