|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400101) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 5 19:29:42 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 19:19:31 2009. Heh. Ain't no liberals up here, bears ate 'em all in the 60's or Cheech and Chong would have moved east. :)Dunno the Dino Rossi story, I kinda lost interest in politics years ago. But for a "one time decision" it's amusing how often the good old "Bushgore" thing plays now. As far as Minnesota goes, don't live there, none of my business how they run their show. The only thing I note from any of this is that it sounds as though Coleman is *really* grasping at straws from some of the later arguments I've seen. Usually an electoral complaint is a bit more clear cut. But then Minnesota isn't New York. I could cite chapter and verse if it happened here. :) |
|
|
|