|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400118) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 5 20:30:39 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 20:12:25 2009. Good question if those are the numbers. All I was going with is that similar has happened in other elections (including NY) and has also gone numerically the other way where hundreds or thousands of ballots turned up missing. Just so ya know where I'm coming from, shens happen in every election even though those at the polling places are able to count their balls and come up with the same number repeatedly, somehow when those numbers go upstream all sorts of black holes and wormholes form.Taking an issue to court however requires PROFF (and proof isn't a bad thing either) and oddly, when Coleman has appeared before the courts he didn't have the proff. Didn't have the proof either and supposedly that's why they kept taking a cattle prod to him. I'll say this for Franken though I *despise* him as a comic, radio "host" and a politician - he seems to have avoided coming off like a crybaby ... and HE was behind for most of this saga ... Welcome to politics though, this is how the game is played. :( |
|
|
|