| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400157) | |||
|  | |||
| Home > OTChat | |||
| [ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] | 
 | ||
|  | 
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota | |
| Posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 22:45:05 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 5 20:30:39 2009.The thing that stands out most about this recount is that just about every change to the voting favored Franken -- both the seemingly legitimate and the head-scratchers, like... Some judge found 30 absentee ballots in his car a few days after they were due; and 133 vote cards are mysteriously "lost" in one district -- so they used the original vote tallies that included the 133 vote cards even though they can't confirm that they ever existed for the recount. | 
|  | 
|  | 
|  |