|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400163) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jan 5 23:01:43 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 22:45:05 2009. One thing I learned years ago about politics is that there are no losers - if things don't turn out the way you want, you can sue. But of course when politicos sue, it's *never* "frivolous" ... in Coleman's case though one has to bear in mind that the judges are largely of his own party and they keep tossing him out. The Minneapolis newspaper was printing examples of the various ballots tossed out by both sides, asking their readers to play along and decide for themselves based on the rules. It was rather amusing since "what the voter intended" was rather obvious at times even though they were rejected. Others were accepted but violated miniscule technicalities. Such is the nature of polls in most states.If you don't win, you try to win on a technicality. But you have to hit up the court with a valid argument and evidence. Looks like Coleman was unable to play the game properly ... |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|