|
|
| Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota (400536) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota |
|
|
Posted by JLenard on Tue Jan 6 21:47:42 2009, in response to Re: State Supreme Court rules against Coleman Re: Minnesota, posted by Charles G on Mon Jan 5 20:12:25 2009. What is NOT at all surprising is how the process of "All the Votes must be counted" (RS: Stealing in MN and in an Article I did on Early Voting I coined a term "Late-Voting" where Post-Election votes would magically appear [now prophetic, just didn't know it would relate to this race] which was seen in Gary IN where polls were kept open late while returns pile in from other Districts ACORN is then able to drum up more needed Dead Folk to cast ballots to try and offset votes from the rest of the State) whether valid/legal or not is the mantra while a Liberal is behind and there "must be closure" when there are calls to "ensure ALL LEGAL/VALID VOTES ARE COUNTED and counted only ONCE" the MSM and the US Senate (RS: Reid quick to try to seat Franken while barring Burris at the door on technicality).... The LAW clearly allows for Coleman to register a Challenge to the Election via the Courts (Officially Contest the Election) with 7 days to do so before the MN SOS can "Certify" the Election.... The MN Courts have NOT excluded the Coleman arguments but rejected his "STANDING" since the Election recount had not yet concluded!!! |
|
|
|