|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1373907) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Nov 17 13:07:39 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Nov 17 12:53:48 2015. I don't see any relationship with someone being an alcoholic and someone ODing. What does one thing have to do with the other?People who don’t drink or use drugs don’t overdose on alcohol and drugs. That it was not about the assassination is even more outlandish. In order to be plausible it would have to be something someone would be willing to commit murder over. I do objectively analyze everything. The problem is that people like you are gullible and naïve and believe everything that’s weakly asserted until “disproven.” The problem is that it doesn’t work that way; it is up to the person making an assertion to prove it and not the other way around. None of the conspiracy theorists have ever come up with anything that isn’t implausible bullshit for one reason or another. It would make no sense to pick them apart one by one, there are plenty of people who have already done that and whose work I’ve read. |
|
|
|