|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374851) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Nov 23 20:20:04 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Nov 23 12:13:53 2015. Again, you are putting words in my mouth and reading what I never wrote. How could I have stated my sister's dreams were premonitory when she wasn't trying to warn me of anything? She told me what happened after the fact, not in an attempt to change my behavior.And your explanations were not plausible at all. There was no way I subconsciously wanted to speak to the individual in question who I never had any association with. And your last sentence in itself is contradictory. You say everything is explainable. Then you say if it isn't, you try to figure something out. And sometimes you never figure it out. We still have thousands of unexplained flying objects. Shouldn't we have figured them all out by now? If we have a reason for all of them, then we only have EFOs (Explained flying objects) not UFOs. (Unexpained Flying Objects). |
|
|
|