Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374770) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Nov 23 12:13:53 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Nov 23 12:08:48 2015. Nope. You claimed that your and your sisters’ dreams were premonitory. I lump that in under “ESP.” You don’t have to say something explicitly in order to say something.I have an open mind. An open mind to know that you are claiming that your dreams are premonitory. I know enough to say that any such claims are bullshit. I never said my explanations were exactly correct. Only that they were plausible. Everything is explainable. That’s the whole idea behind science; if you can’t explain something, then you try to figure out how. |