|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374085) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 13:09:20 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Nov 18 11:25:05 2015. All I can say to that is that we don't know the reasons for everything that happens in this worlld and to think that there couldn't be explanations for phenomena we don't understand is naive if that is the correct word.First, that’s not the correct word and second, I never said that there “couldn’t be explanations for phenomena we don’t understand.” Of course there are explanations! We just don’t know all of them. But I’m not going to make stuff up, I’ll just wait until it is actually explained. The reason I come to that conclusion is that while I woudn't consider myself psychic. . . Sorry, but that’s inadequate. Psychic phenomena are complete and utter bullshit. There are reasonable and non-supernatural explanations for those things. And they are: You never had a dream, you just thought you did after the fact, OR you did have such a dream, but there is no fucking way you remember the exact conversation from the dream, and then you misremembered the details in order to fit your narrative because you are amenable to such beliefs. Coincidences can happen on many occasions. Why can’t they? If you don't believe me, I really don't care. So you don’t care about reality. |
|
|
|