|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374302) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Nov 19 13:07:23 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Nov 19 12:58:41 2015. 1. I don't care. Opinions aren't facts.2. Do I have to repeat myself? "You still remembered this person. Forgetting doesn't mean that the memory is lost, just that's it's not readily available to your conscious mind." Yes, it is plausible. It is certainly more possible than psychic powers. 3. It is completely relevant because you are using your bias in favor of the existence of psychic powers to "prove" that they exist. 4. No, I believe that you remember things to have happened a certain way. I am just speculating on valid, plausible explanations and not chalking up the weird stuff to obvious bullshit like psychic powers as you are. 5. OK, someone else made up psychic powers and you just follow along. That's the same thing. 6. Apparently you've never heard of the word "theory." That is not how "theory" works in science. "A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation." Psychic powers are consequently not a theory. Evolution is an example. That doesn't mean that evolution isn't a fact. If you required definitive proof of eveyrthing, then for all you know the world is just your dream. There is no way to prove that it isn't! |
|
|
|