|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374294) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Nov 19 12:58:41 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Nov 19 10:55:38 2015. 1. Many would disagree with that.2. I barely remembered this person since I had little or no contact with him ever. You stated that subconciously I wanted to meet him. Why should I want to meet soeone I hardly knew and didn't even like? Your explanation is just not plausible. 3. What does it matter how she remembered her dream? That is totally irrelevant. The point was that the story is to,d me happened actually happened when she would have no way of knowing that. How you can say that isn't remarkable is beyond me, other than you just can't admit it. 4. I never claimed to have any psychic powers. I just tlod you what happened and you just refuse to believe it. I also believe that 90% of psychics are bullshit artists out to make a buck and that there are a few legitimate psychics and those are the ones who do not seek publicity. 5. I. don't make anything up. 6. Apparently you never heard of the word "theory". That is an idea that you don't have specific proof for but can present an intelligent argument that suggests it is true, perhaps not conclusively. That's why it is a theory. When the proof is found, then it becomes a "fact." |
|
|
|