|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374477) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Nov 20 16:20:06 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Nov 19 13:07:23 2015. You are the one who is requiring definitive proof not me because you insist that if there is no scientific proof "it is bullshit." My friend's life was saved after cancer was discovered in three places by an unapproved experimental drug that showed some promise in France. There was no scientific proof that it really worked. If the doctor chose to wait for the proof which came three years later when it was approved in the US, he would have died. Yet the doctor took a chance. So I suppose saving his life was just bullshit.I am merely stating there are phenomena for which we have no plausible explanations. You are the one who brought up psychic powers, not me. I never got into a debate on that with you and will not. You are insisting there are plausible explanations. My dream predicted I would see a certain person six monhts in advance and he would make a certain statement. A person I barely knew and even disliked who I deliberately tried to avoid when I really did see him. Yet, he made the same or very similar statement to the one in my dream. Yet you insist a plausible explanation is either I subconsciously wanted to meet him or I fabricated the entire dream or do not remember what happened at the reunion and am fabricating that also because people have faulty memories. You are conveniently manipulating the facts to fit into your pre-determined conclusions. I am not saying psychic powers exist but I am open to believing they may exist. There is a difference. Your mind is just closed. My sister described what she dreamt or thought to have dreamt and gave an exact description of what actually happened which was not your usual urban mugging when she didn't even know I was mugged, and because of your bias your plausible explanation is that she misremembered her dream, I misremembered what she said to me or I do not accurately remember the circumstances how I was mugged or I imagined the mugging entirely. That is your "plausible" explanation of events because you believe they were unremarkable and just ordinary occurrences because no one can give a proper explanation for the events. |
|
|
|