|
|
| Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374113) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Nov 18 16:50:30 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 18 13:09:20 2015. Sorry, but I wasn't talking about a single dream. I was talking about a half dozen of them. So you say I imagined all of them? And why couldn't I remember the exact words from the dream or my feelings in the dream? Of course I could. Even if I misremembered the exact conversation, it was still close enough to be remarkable. Just the fact that soeone I barely knew even showed up at the reunion six months after I had the dream is remarkable by itself. And since I told my sister the dream right after it happened, proves I could not have imagined having it. I thought about it for six months asking myself, what if he shows up and says what I heard in the dream. Of course there were doe differences between hte dream and what actually happened. I never said it was a duplicate of reality.I also forgot to say that in the dream where my friend killed himself, I knew in the dream that he did not have a heart attack as I dreamt and as his mother really told me in the phone. Another friend also did not believe his mother so he had a policeman friend check the records and we were both correct. So you are saying that dream was also imagined? Of course coincidences can happen on many occasions. I have had many of them. What I meant is that I do not believe how all the prophetic dreams I have had and the one my sister had where she described my mugging as if she witnessed are coincidences and from what we know now, they are unexplainable. Your explanation that I never had the dreams just means you don't believe me and doesn't explain the dream my sister had. I am not saying the explanation is supernatural. I am just saying that everything is not explainable. |
|
|
|