Re: Dorothy Kilgallen (1374298) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: Dorothy Kilgallen |
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Nov 19 13:04:11 2015, in response to Re: Dorothy Kilgallen, posted by Spider-Pig on Thu Nov 19 10:56:41 2015. That would be true if I was the only one to suggest that, but I wasn't. It is a possibility that has not or possibly cannot be proven. What would you say if new evidence arises suggesting that it did happen. You would find any reason not to believe it, because it s something you don't want to believe. You would not look at the evidence objectively because it has to be a "hairbrained" conspiracy because conspiracies cannot exist since you labeled all of them as "hairbrained". |