|
|
| Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven (311309) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Thu Mar 10 15:22:14 2016, in response to Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven, posted by R30A on Thu Mar 10 11:03:21 2016. If you look at the numbers DOT provided the only possible scenario for drivers to outnumber bus passengers in a 24 hour period is the scenario I outlined and already explained to you.For the fifth time, if the peak hour is all that matters, then the proposal must apply to the peak hour only which it does not. IT IS A 24 HOUR PROPOSAL AND CAN ONLY BE JUSTIFIED WITH 24 HOUR DATA. "The intersection at Metropolitan WILL BE ABLE TO MOVE MORE CARS THAN PRIOR TO THUS PROJECT." ABSOLUTELY NO DATA TO SUPPORT THAT AND IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC. When can I sell you the Brooklyn Bridge? You believe every bit of nonsense DOT utters. The right turn lane will also be the through lane so cars will have to slow down. With a bus bulb and a bus lane and no left turn lane, only three other lanes reman which means one of the through lanes will also be act as a right turn lane. Therefore cars going through the intersection in the right lane will have to slow down if the car ahead makes a left turn. That slows down traffic and increases air pollution. So saying there will be separate right turn lanes IS INCORRECT. Show me one iota of proof to show the intersection. YOU HAVE NONE. It is blatantly unsafe only in your mind. Where is your data? You don't even have an anecdote. You shouldn't spend money solving a problem that doesn't even exist. Yes Woodhaven narrows to three lanes which is why no bus lane is proposed for the overpass. |
|
|
|