|
|
| Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson (619533) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Mon May 19 17:48:55 2008, in response to Re: PHOTOS: Port Authority Trans-Hudson, posted by 156n3rd on Mon May 19 10:53:41 2008. I know of frame fatiue as well, but it is not a problem on rigid subway cars, only the bolster areas. A well designed, balanced frame and structure will have minimal fatigue effects, and wear will be concentrated on replaceable parts like wheels and axles. You gotta think more.Guy, i like both systems too. I do not obsess over PATH. It should be expanded, yes, particularly in new jersey. Oh, and guy, mark my words, one day, i WILL call the shots on the PATH system, and even on the MTA system, and i will provide the greatest transit services ever, on good rolling stock with good comforts and all. I will also build new, and EXCELLENT transit systems, and help education and healthcare along the way, as well as protect mother nature. I will do all of this once i get "some grips on some reins", my particular plans to get some grips are secret, because i don't want to blow it, but i will do it. PS, all those perverted, and idiotic managers will no longer have their useless jobs. It won't cost 100 million dollars to construct a one mile rail section, and it won't take ten years to build a stubway(second ave). |
|
|
|